Blog › Comparisons

Quizizz vs Gimkit: Gameplay, Cost and Classroom Fit Compared

Most teachers comparing Quizizz vs Gimkit have already used one and want to know whether the other is worth the setup time. The two overlap enough to look interchangeable, but they rest on different assumptions about what a review activity is for. Working out which fits your lesson is most of the decision.

One note first: Quizizz rebranded to Wayground in June 2025 and now lives at wayground.com. Accounts, question sets and join links carried over, and joinmyquiz.com still works, so older links should still function. See our guide to the Quizizz to Wayground rebrand. Here, “Quizizz” means the same platform under either name.

The one-line difference

Quizizz is built to measure what students know. Gimkit is built to make them answer the same questions until the answers stick.

That explains most of the rest. Quizizz walks a class through a set of questions, records who got what, and reports it by question and by student. Gimkit turns a question set into a game economy: students answer to earn in-game currency, spend it on upgrades and power-ups, and keep answering to earn more. The set is not a sequence to finish; it is fuel for a loop that runs as long as the game is open.

How the Gimkit economy loop plays out

Gimkit was created by a student, and the incentive design is clever. Correct answers earn currency, currency buys upgrades that increase earnings, and better upgrades make students want to answer more questions. More questions means more repetition, which is what review needs. Students who would groan at a third pass through twenty vocabulary terms will grind through them six times to afford the next upgrade.

The honest downside is that the strategy layer can eat the content layer. Some students optimise the economy rather than the learning: they work out which upgrade path pays fastest, answer carelessly because a wrong answer costs less than the time spent thinking, and drift towards the shop screen. You also get a spread problem, where the fastest or luckiest pull far enough ahead that the rest of the class stops competing. Several game modes soften this, but watch for it on your first runs.

In practice the room is loud. That is often what you want on a Friday review day, and rarely what you want when quietly checking whether the class understood yesterday’s lesson.

What Quizizz does better

Homework and self-paced work

Quizizz supports a live mode where the class moves together and a self-paced mode where students work on their own schedule. The second is the workhorse: assign a set as homework, leave it open over a weekend, check results Monday. If much of your use is asynchronous, that decides it.

Reporting you can act on

Quizizz gives question-level reports: which questions the class struggled with, which students struggled, where wrong answers clustered. If you run the activity to decide what tomorrow covers, that is the difference-maker. Gimkit reports performance too, but because students answer repeatedly in an order driven by the game, the data is a noisier snapshot of understanding.

Simpler setup

Make or find a set, share a code, students join. Fewer decisions sit between opening the site and running the activity, which matters during a five-minute passing period. Gimkit also asks you to pick a game mode, and the mode changes pacing and length substantially, so it is a deliberate choice.

What Gimkit does better

Sustained energy is the headline. A Quizizz round ends when the questions run out; a Gimkit round runs until the goal or timer is reached, with pacing built to hold the room. For a full review lesson rather than a ten-minute starter, that stamina matters.

Repetition without complaint is the underrated part. Students recycle the same questions many times in one game, and because each pass is framed as earning rather than reviewing, they rarely register it as repetition. For vocabulary, formulas, dates or language drills, that works. Novelty is the third: swapping game modes makes a familiar set feel new again.

Cost, and why it decides this for many teachers

For plenty of teachers the comparison ends at the pricing page. Quizizz has historically offered a free tier covering the core teacher workflow, with paid tiers adding capability. Gimkit is known for a free tier meaningfully more limited than its paid one, with much of the game mode variety behind the paid plan. Teachers who try Gimkit free and find it thin often discover the version a colleague raved about was paid.

Plans and limits change regularly, so treat this as a shape rather than a specification and check the current pricing page. On the Quizizz side, see our breakdown of whether Quizizz is free and what the player limits are.

Prep time and reusing question sets

Both tools run on the same raw material: a list of questions with answers. Moving that between platforms is tedious rather than difficult, and both offer ways to build from existing content. Quizizz also has a large public library of teacher-made sets, a time saver on standard topics.

The practical difference is planning, not authoring. A Quizizz activity runs roughly as long as its question list, so you can estimate it. A Gimkit activity’s length depends on the mode and goal, so budget some imprecision the first time you use a new mode.

Quizizz vs Gimkit side by side

Choose this if

Choose Quizizz if

• You assign homework or want students working at their own pace
• You need reporting that shows clearly which concepts to reteach
• You want minimal friction between deciding to run an activity and running it
• You want to stay within a free tier that covers everyday work
• You are checking understanding rather than staging a review event

Choose Gimkit if

• Your content rewards drilling: vocabulary, formulas, dates, language practice
• You need a full lesson of engagement rather than a short starter
• Your class has tired of the same quiz format and needs novelty
• You can budget for a paid plan, or your free-tier needs are modest
• You are comfortable managing a noisier, more competitive room

Teachers who use both often do not pick one. Gimkit runs during review week, when the goal is repetition and energy; Quizizz runs for the checks along the way and anything assigned outside class, when the goal is data. Owning one tool for each job is a reasonable answer.

Where the other tools fit

If the game layer appeals but the cost model does not, compare Quizizz vs Blooket. For flashcards and vocabulary study, Quizizz vs Quizlet fits better. For live whole-class quizzing, see Quizizz vs Kahoot compared, and our Quizizz guides and quiz resources cover setup, joining and reporting.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gimkit better than Quizizz?

Neither is better overall; they are built for different jobs. Gimkit is stronger for repetition and energy in a review lesson. Quizizz is stronger for self-paced or homework assignment and for reporting that tells you what to reteach. Match the tool to the lesson’s goal.

Can I reuse my Quizizz questions in Gimkit?

Both platforms run on the same underlying material, so moving content across means transferring text rather than rebuilding a lesson. Each offers ways to import or build from existing content, and the options change, so check the current import documentation on each site.

Does Quizizz still work now that it is Wayground?

Yes. The June 2025 rebrand moved the site to wayground.com, but accounts, saved question sets and join links carried over, and joinmyquiz.com still works for students entering a code. Old links in your slides or LMS should still function.

Is the free version of Gimkit enough for a classroom?

It is usable but noticeably more limited than the paid tier, with much of the game mode variety reserved for paying accounts. Whether that is enough depends on how often you use it and how much you rely on rotating modes. Plans change, so check the current pricing page.